modern military academies still study clausewitzian principles of warfare.
現代軍事學院仍然研究克勞塞維茨的戰爭原則。
the clausewitzian concept of the fog of war remains relevant in modern strategic thinking.
克勞塞維茨所提出的戰爭迷霧概念，在現代戰略思維中仍然具有重要意義。
according to clausewitz, war is merely the continuation of policy by other means.
根據克勞塞維茨的觀點，戰爭不過是政策的延續，只是以其他手段來實現。
many scholars have analyzed the clausewitzian trinity of passion, chance, and reason.
許多學者已經分析過克勞塞維茨所提出的激情、偶然與理性這三種戰爭要素。
the clausewitzian doctrine emphasizes that war should serve clear political objectives.
克勞塞維茨的學說強調戰爭應當服務於明確的政治目標。
his clausewitzian framework helps us understand the relationship between military force and politics.
他的克勞塞維茨框架幫助我們理解軍事力量與政治之間的關係。
clausewitzian thought recognizes that friction makes warfare inherently unpredictable.
克勞塞維茨的理論認為，摩擦使戰爭本質上具有不可預測性。
military historians often debate the clausewitzian definition of absolute war versus limited war.
軍事史學家經常就克勞塞維茨對絕對戰爭與有限戰爭的定義進行辯論。
the clausewitzian approach integrates both moral and physical factors in warfare.
克勞塞維茨的方法將道德與物理因素都納入戰爭之中。
contemporary strategists continue to draw upon clausewitzian principles for modern conflicts.
當代戰略家們仍然沿用克勞塞維茨的原則來應對現代衝突。
the clausewitzian dialectic between offense and defense shapes tactical decisions.
克勞塞維茨所提出的進攻與防禦之間的辯證關係影響戰術決策。
clausewitzian influence extends beyond military circles into business strategy and political analysis.
克勞塞維茨的影響力已超越軍事範疇，擴展至企業戰略與政治分析。
modern military academies still study clausewitzian principles of warfare.
現代軍事學院仍然研究克勞塞維茨的戰爭原則。
the clausewitzian concept of the fog of war remains relevant in modern strategic thinking.
克勞塞維茨所提出的戰爭迷霧概念，在現代戰略思維中仍然具有重要意義。
according to clausewitz, war is merely the continuation of policy by other means.
根據克勞塞維茨的觀點，戰爭不過是政策的延續，只是以其他手段來實現。
many scholars have analyzed the clausewitzian trinity of passion, chance, and reason.
許多學者已經分析過克勞塞維茨所提出的激情、偶然與理性這三種戰爭要素。
the clausewitzian doctrine emphasizes that war should serve clear political objectives.
克勞塞維茨的學說強調戰爭應當服務於明確的政治目標。
his clausewitzian framework helps us understand the relationship between military force and politics.
他的克勞塞維茨框架幫助我們理解軍事力量與政治之間的關係。
clausewitzian thought recognizes that friction makes warfare inherently unpredictable.
克勞塞維茨的理論認為，摩擦使戰爭本質上具有不可預測性。
military historians often debate the clausewitzian definition of absolute war versus limited war.
軍事史學家經常就克勞塞維茨對絕對戰爭與有限戰爭的定義進行辯論。
the clausewitzian approach integrates both moral and physical factors in warfare.
克勞塞維茨的方法將道德與物理因素都納入戰爭之中。
contemporary strategists continue to draw upon clausewitzian principles for modern conflicts.
當代戰略家們仍然沿用克勞塞維茨的原則來應對現代衝突。
the clausewitzian dialectic between offense and defense shapes tactical decisions.
克勞塞維茨所提出的進攻與防禦之間的辯證關係影響戰術決策。
clausewitzian influence extends beyond military circles into business strategy and political analysis.
克勞塞維茨的影響力已超越軍事範疇，擴展至企業戰略與政治分析。
探索常見搜尋詞彙